Attendees
of Baabda meeting: the violent opposition that cuts down the homeland and inflicts
harm on public and private property does not fall under the category of
democratic and peaceful opposition.
Baabda
National Meeting: Unifying positions of methods to address the economic and financial
Crisis by adopting a final path for structural reforms in public finances.
President
Aoun: “What happened in recent weeks should be a warning to everyone to be
alert to security threats”.
President
Aoun: “There are those who take advantage of people’s anger, and legitimate
demands, to achieve suspicious foreign agendas”.
President
Aoun: “We have to be one hand in confronting sedition and fortifying civil
peace this is the true red line, and there will be no tolerance for anyone
trying to cross it”.
Prime
Minister Diab: “The country is not doing well, but treatment is a national
responsibility, everyone is responsible in contributing to the rescue workshop”.
Prime
Minister Diab: Nothing will remain in the country to compete for if this rift
continues”.
Prime
Minister Diab: “Let this meeting be the beginning of a broad national effort,
from which a committee to follow up on communications will emerge, under the
dome of the Parliament, with all political forces, the demand movement, and
civil society”.
The National
Meeting, held today at Baabda Palace, unanimously agreed to halt all kinds of campaigns
which would stir discord, threaten civil peace, and destabilize internal
security. The meeting was held at the invitation of President of the Republic,
General Michel Aoun, and attended by Parliament Speaker, Nabih Berri, Prime
Minister, Hassan Diab in addition to leaders and heads of Parliamentary blocs.
Attendees considered
that the freedom of expression, which is protected in the text of the constitution,
should be exercised within the limits of the law, which criminalizes insults, and
infringement of dignities and other personal freedoms.
Although attendees
considered that a democratic life is not just without the presence of an
opposition, especially parliamentary ones, they stressed that the violent
opposition that cuts the nation’s ties and harms public and private property
does not fall within the category of democratic and peaceful opposition.
Then, conferees
affirmed the necessity, “To unify attitudes towards ways to address the
economic, financial and monetary crisis and its social repercussions by
adopting a final path for structural reforms in public finances and the
adoption of the International Monetary Fund program if agreed to its reform
conditions”.
For his side, President
Aoun had started the meeting with a speech in which he said that he was hoping
to include all parties and political forces, considering that what happened in
recent weeks should be a warning to everyone to be alert to all security
threats. “There are those who take advantage of people’s anger, and their
legitimate demands, in order to generate violence and chaos, to achieve
suspicious foreign agendas with the political gains of parties inside” the
President asserted.
And while President
Aoun explained that the political difference is at the basis of a democratic
life, he stressed that its roof remains civil peace “And no matter how tense
the speeches are, we should not allow any spark to ignite it”.
In addition,
the President stressed that “Unity around critical options is a necessity, we
have to unite hands in facing sedition and fortifying civil peace so that we do
not enter into a tunnel from which there is no exit. This is the true red line,
and there will be no tolerance with those who try to pass it”.
For his part,
Prime Minister Diab considered that the country is not okay but the treatment
is a national responsibility, not only the responsibility of a government that
came out of the rubble of the crisis, or the responsibility of previous
governments that were hiding the crisis, but everyone today is concerned with
contributing to the rescue workshop, stressing that “We do not have the luxury
of time for bidding, settling scores and achieving political gains”.
PM Diab
considered that “Nothing will remain in the country to compete for if this
rift, estrangement and free battles persist”, and called for this meeting to be
“The beginning of a broad national action, from which a committee that monitors
communications under the dome of the Parliament, with all political forces, and
civil society, to submit recommendations to this meeting again under the
auspices of the President of the Republic”.
The “National
Gathering” was attended by Speaker Berri and Prime Minister Diab, former President
Michel Suleiman, Deputy Speaker of Parliament Elie Al-Ferzly, Head of the
Mountain Guarantee Bloc, MP Talal Arslan, Head of the National Social Bloc MP,
Assaad Hardan, Head of the Strong Lebanese Bloc, MP Gebran Bassil,
Representative of the Consultative Meeting Bloc, MP Faysal Karami, Head of the
Armenian Representatives Bloc, MP Hagop Pakradounian, Head of the Loyalty to
the Resistance Bloc, MP Muhammad Raad, Head of the Democratic Gathering Bloc, MP
Taymour Jumblatt.
President Aoun’s
Speech:
“Esteemed audience,
Welcome and thank you for attending this meeting which
only bears one title: “the protection of stability and civil peace”, especially
in light of recent developments.
I was therefore hoping that all the country’s parties
and political forces would join us because civil peace is a ‘red line’ and all
the wills are supposed to converge in order to reinforce it, since it is the
responsibility of everyone and does not solely befall one individual, no matter
how highly he is ranked, neither one party, nor one actor.
What happened on the streets in the past weeks, especially
in Tripoli, Beirut and Ain El Remmaneh, must sound the alarm for us all to
sense the security dangers that have tried to ignite sedition by pulling the
trigger of social demands. And it seemed obvious that some were using the
people’s anger and legitimate demands to sow violence and chaos, in view of
fulfilling suspicious external agendas while scoring political gains for
internal parties.
We have alarmingly had a brush with the atmosphere of
civil war and movements were suspiciously launched, loaded with confessional
and sectarian feud and mobilizing emotions; moreover violence, violation of
public and private properties, contempt against religions and abusive language
have been portrayed as a legitimate right for the perpetrators.
In view of such an unprecedented chaos, charging
spirits and reverting to the obsolete language of war which was dearly paid for
by Lebanon in the past, and based on my constitutional responsibilities, I had
to call for this inclusive national meeting to put a definitive end to this
dangerous security derailment.
Political divergence is healthy and at the core of
democratic life, but its ceiling remains civil peace which cannot be crossed.
No matter how heated the rhetoric may be, we must not allow any spark to slip
out of it, because putting out the fire is not as easy as starting it,
especially if it gets out of control; and this is the responsibility of all of
us, attendees and absentees alike.
Today, our country is going through the worst
financial and economic crisis, and our people are experiencing daily suffering,
fearing for their lifelong savings, concerned for their future, desperate about
losing their jobs and their decent living.
I say it loud and clear, no rescue is possible if some
continue to easily tamper with security, manipulate the street, mobilize
confessional and sectarian sensitivities, put spokes in the wheels and chime
with some external parties which are striving to turn Lebanon into a field to
settle accounts and score advantages by starving, terrorizing and strangling
people economically.
If we think that collapse will spare anyone, we are
mistaken;
Or that hunger and unemployment have a confessional or
political color, we are delusional;
Or that violence on the streets is like strings that
we manipulate anytime we want and stop by our own will, we are overlooking the
lessons of the recent past, as well as those of the region and the
neighborhood.
Before the vital challenges that Lebanon is facing and
amid the regional turbulence, the tall waves that are hitting our shores, and
the perils that may stem from the legislation called the “Caesar Act”, unity
around decisive choices is imperative.
Our
aim from this meeting today is only to promote this unity and prevent chaos.
Yes,
the difference of opinion is a human right and an intellectual incentive; yet,
we have to stick together, hand in hand, in countering sedition and
consolidating civil peace in order not to enter a tunnel with no way out.
This
is the real red line and we will have zero-tolerance for those who try to cross
it!
Thank you”.
Prime Minister
Diab’s Speech:
“Firstly, I
would like to thank the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, for
this call, which carries a high degree of national responsibility in pushing
towards a meeting of the Lebanese in a dialogue which obstructs the
thunderbolts of sedition and seeks exits for the current deep crises in the
country.
The Lebanese
are anxiously looking to the future, because the present is confused and
because the economic, social and living conditions leave behind black shadows,
painful tragedies and a social groove, which some fail to notice.
Yes, the
country is not okay.
How can the
homeland be fine while citizens are hungry?!
This is a
description of chronic reality, however treatment is a national responsibility,
not only the responsibility of a Government that came to the ruins of the
crisis, and managed to reduce the impact on the reserve and contain all
repercussions, when it decided boldly to stop paying debts, which neared 4.6
Billion US Dollars this year. Imagine the result if we had paid this amount
from Lebanese reserves!
Moreover, the
remedy is not only the responsibility of previous Governments that were hiding
this crisis, then this Government came to boldly reveal the numbers of
accumulated financial losses transparently, in the context of a financial
rescue plan, which is the first in Lebanese history.
Today, everyone
is interested in contributing to the rescue workshop. We don’t have the luxury
of time to settle scores and gain political points. Nothing will remain in Lebanon
to compete for if this rupture continues.
We are going
through a crucial stage in Lebanese history, which requires us to join efforts,
provide the country’s interest and prioritize the logic of the state, in order
to be able to reduce the extent of the damages which may be disastrous.
Let me speak
frankly, the Lebanese do not expect fruitful results from this meeting.
In the Lebanese
view, this meeting will be like previous ones, and after this meeting will be
like before, and perhaps worse.
Today, the
Lebanese only care about one thing: How much will the Dollar rate be? Is it not
the truth?
The Lebanese
will not scrutinize the terms we have included in our speeches. No longer care
what we say. They only care what we will do. And I admit and reassure: our
words have no value if we do not translate them into actions that relieve the
Lebanese from burdens.
The Lebanese
want the judiciary to act against corruption and the corrupt. The Lebanese want
the Central Bank to control the Dollar exchange rate vs the Lebanese Pound, and
save the value of their salaries and savings. This is what the Lebanese want,
and this is what we are supposed to be all responsible for achieving.
Proceeding from that, I call, with all love, that this meeting be the beginning
of a broad national action, from which a committee that follows communications
under the dome of the Parliament emerges, with all political forces and civil
society bodies to submit recommendations to this meeting again, and under the
auspices of His Excellency the President of the Republic.
May God help us
for the good of Lebanon, and the Lebanese to cross this difficult ordeal which
pressures our homeland.
Long Live
Lebanon and the Lebanese”.
Meeting
Statement:
After the
meeting, former Minister, Salim Jreisatti, read the meeting’s statement:
“At the
invitation of His Excellency, President Michel Aoun, a national meeting was
held today, Thursday 25th of June 2020, at Baabda Palace. The
meeting was attended by: Parliament Speaker, Nabih Berri, Prime Minister, Dr.
Hassan Diab, former President Michel Sleiman, Parliament Speaker Deputy, Elie
Ferzly, head of Mountain Guarantee Bloc, MP Talal Arslan, head of the National
Social Bloc, MP Assaad Hardan, head of Strong Lebanon Bloc, MP Gebran Bassil,
Representative of the Consultative Gathering Bloc, MP Faisal Karameh, head of
the Armenian Representatives Bloc, MP Hagop Pakradounian, head of Loyalty to
the Resistance Bloc, MP Mohammed Raad, and head of the Democratic Gathering
Bloc, MP Timor Joumblat.
The meeting
tackled the general situation in the country, especially the security situation
after recent developments which took place two weeks ago, in Beirut and
Tripoli.
It was agreed
on the following:
First: Security
stability is the basis for, but rather a condition for, political, economic,
social, financial and monetary stability. As for confronting sedition, and
sectarian charging, in preparation for chaos, it is a collective responsibility
in which all components of the society and its political components are shared.
Accordingly,
the meeting called for stopping all kinds of provocative campaigns that would
provoke sedition, threaten civil peace and destabilize internal security which
was achieved due to the awareness of those responsible for the country’s
capabilities and the efforts of the military and security forces, and their
preemptive and field response to terrorism, its cells and the abolitionist
idea.
Second:
Freedom of expression is safeguarded in the forefront of the constitution and
its body, provided that this freedom is exercised within the limits of the law
that criminalizes insults and infringement of dignities, and other personal
freedoms. The limit of freedom is the truth and there is no limit to it except
freedom of the other and respecting the law.
Third:
Democratic life in our parliamentary constitutional system does not exist
without the presence of the opposition, especially the Parliamentary opposition,
and the right to demonstrate and express protected by the constitution and the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights; This is because the people are the
source of authorities, but the violent opposition which cuts down the homeland
and harms its children and public and private properties does not fall into the
category of democratic and peaceful opposition. In times of existential crises,
the Government and the opposition meet and work together to save the country
from any threat it encountered.
Fourth:
Lebanon is undergoing a complex and worsening crisis, political, economic,
financial, social and health, however this crisis will not overcome Lebanese
will, and the people’s will not be defeated by it. We derive from the history
of Lebanon a system of moral and patriotic values that we rely on and find in
it a safe haven against fragmentation, dispersal and fighting. It is a crisis
that is more dangerous than war, and in times of major crises we must all take
political action to the national level, bypassing authoritarian considerations.
The people are not hostile to themselves nor hostile to their homeland, and we
all must bear the responsibilities resulting from this equation.
Fifth:
Building on this meeting to start from consensual research, without
prohibitions, but by upholding the common national interest in order to deal
with the spirit of responsibility and understanding the joints of the big
differences that fuel our divisions, so we seek together to unify positions or shortening
distances between positions, at least on the entity and existential issues that
relate to our country’s unity and the permanence of our state, which includes:
- Ways to
address the economic, financial and monetary crisis and its social
repercussions by adopting a final path for structural reforms (in our public
finances) and the adoption of the International Monetary Fund program if we
agreed on its reform conditions because they do not conflict with our interest
and sovereignty and by seriously fighting corruption on the rights of
depositors and our free economic system, and making this system productive as
stated in our constitution.
- The
development that must be adopted in our political system in order to be more
viable and productive in the context of implementing the constitution, and
developing it in terms of bridging the gaps and implementing what has not been
achieved from the National Accord Document.
- The main
issues related to the supreme Lebanese interest in terms of affirming the
position of Lebanon and its role in its surroundings and the world as a bridge
between the East and West and a convergence area of religions and beliefs, and
the implications of all foreign policies affecting this identity (Arab) and its
location (unifying) such as Caesar’s Law and the issue of displacement,
settlement, and execution of the Palestinian cause, with its destructive
effects on Lebanon, and its interaction with its surroundings.
President
Michel Suleiman expressed his reservations on the statement”.
Tripartite
meeting:
The national
meeting was preceded by a meeting between President Aoun Speaker Berri and PM Diab,
during which the latest developments were deliberated.
Former President
Suleiman:
After the
meeting, President Suleiman spoke to the journalists and said:
“I thanked
President Aoun for the invitation to this meeting, and I wished at the
beginning of the President of the Republic to adjourn the session after
delivering his speech for further consultations without issuing a statement
except briefly, in order to collect the components that did not attend today. I
do not speak about the charter, as there is disagreement about who is my
charter and who is not my charter, but there are components who represent a
large segment of the Lebanese people because democracy, the parliament and the
cabinet are one issue, and dialogue is another. Dialogue includes all segments
of society.
The core of my
request is to return to the Baabda Declaration. On this basis, and although the
statement contains some good points, all of which were mentioned in this
Declaration, I objected to it because no dialogue begins except from where the previous
dialogue ended. Baabda’s billboard was hung here in the October 22 Hall,
Independence Hall, but it was burned. But if it burned, does that mean it
ended? The document is in the United Nations and the Arab League. I ask His
Excellency, the President and those present with love, to come back to adopt
this document, otherwise we have no salvation. In economics, I am neither a
specialist nor a member of it. In civil peace, we saw that people accepted each
other after the motorcycle issue, and all popular officials denounced and
mobilized to prevent attacks. Therefore, we do not need a meeting here, but
rather a decision by the President, the government, and the security apparatuses
to take necessary measures, and I do not think that anyone wants chaos in
Lebanon. We are not under any illusion that the civil peace has been shaken. It
shook because the currency collapsed, but the collapse of the currency is not
fixed by settling accounts, but by public policy. The policy that we follow
does not take us to an economy and it changes everything”.
MP Hardan:
After the
meeting, Representative Hardan made the following statement:
“We consider
that all discussions took place on how to strengthen national unity and civil
peace, with full description that civil peace is threatened in the country. And
security here is a broad title related to individual security, food security,
and national security and how to address these situations. The Lebanese are
very concerned about their present and future. We consider this to be the most
important element of division and collision. What is required is to get out of
this matter and for that reason the discussion today touched on some points
that came under the title of implementing the constitution. The issues that
were raised aside were not on the agenda. The interlocutors have the right to
put forth what they want and what they want, but the main title was about how
to promote civil peace and national unity, while seriously thinking that
Lebanon had put its head for a long time in the sand.
We discussed all
issues in terms of what the state must bear to confront Caesar’s law repercussions,
and this new blockade on Lebanon, which our country has to face in order to
secure Lebanese interests. Our country must open a network of relations
starting from Syria to the entire Arab world. Lebanon is an Arab country and
Syria is an Arab country, and these channels are supposed to be opened in favor
of Lebanon. Today we are called to move in this direction, because all these
matters promote national unity and civil peace.
The Lebanese
need stability and do not need inflammatory slogans for strife, collision and
division. What is required is Lebanon’s exit from this crisis, and this is
through the implementation of constitutional texts”.
Deputy of Parliament
Speaker:
Then Deputy of
the Parliament Speaker, Elie Al-Ferzly stated that the news about a dispute concerning
the defense strategy and Baabda Agreement occurring with him, then Muhammad
Raad, and turned into a heated debate with former President Suleiman, is
totally incorrect and unfounded.
“It is not time
to transform such dialogue platforms into platforms to gain immediate and
interim popularities. The dialogue was on how to fortify civil peace in
Lebanon, and this is a matter of the utmost importance and necessity. It is the
goal and therefore everything must be devoted to serving this goal, in addition
to the means that should be pursued through dialogue. The focus was on the
necessity of continuing the dialogue”.